The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) represents a critical component in India's GST dispute resolution framework. After nearly eight years since GST implementation, the GSTAT is finally becoming operational with the notification of the GST Appellate Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 2025 on April 24, 2025.
The constitutional foundation for GSTAT lies in Article 323B of the Constitution of India, inserted through the 42nd Amendment in 1976. This article empowers appropriate legislatures to establish tribunals for tax-related matters, including "levy, assessment, collection and enforcement of any tax." The article further authorizes establishment of a hierarchy of tribunals and provides for exclusion of court jurisdiction except the Supreme Court under Article 136.
The GSTAT is established under Section 109 of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act, 2017, serving as the second appellate forum in the GST dispute resolution hierarchy, after the first appellate authority (under Section 107) or revisional authority (under Section 108).
The GSTAT consists of a Principal Bench in New Delhi and multiple State Benches across India. Currently, 31 State Benches have been designated throughout the country, strategically located to serve different states and regions.
Principal Bench: Consists of the President, one Judicial Member, one Technical Member (Centre), and one Technical Member (State).
State Benches: Each comprises two Judicial Members, one Technical Member (Centre), and one Technical Member (State).
Vice-President: The senior-most Judicial Member within the State Benches is designated as Vice-President for those benches, exercising specified powers of the President.
Justice (Retd.) Sanjaya Kumar Mishra, former Chief Justice of the Jharkhand High Court, has been appointed as the President of GSTAT. His appointment follows selection by a Search-cum-Selection Committee headed by the Chief Justice of India.
The distribution of cases follows clear jurisdictional principles:
Principal Bench Exclusive Jurisdiction:
Appeals involving any issue related to "place of supply"
Anti-profiteering matters under Section 171(2) of CGST Act
Any other matters specifically notified by the government on GST Council's recommendation
State Benches: Handle all other appeals against orders passed by Appellate Authorities or Revisional Authorities within their territorial jurisdiction.
Single Member Bench: For appeals where the disputed amount (tax, input tax credit, fine, fee, or penalty) does not exceed ₹50 lakhs and no question of law is involved, a single member may hear the case with the President's approval.
Appeals can be filed by any person aggrieved by an order passed against them under Section 107 (appellate authority) or Section 108 (revisional authority).
Unlike appeals before the first appellate authority (which allows "any person aggrieved"), GSTAT appeals can only be filed by a person against whom the order was passed.
Appeals must be filed within 3 months from the date of communication of the challenged order.
The GSTAT can condone a delay of up to another 3 months on sufficient cause being shown.
For departmental appeals, the time limit is 6 months, with a similar 3-month condonation period.
Importantly, the clock for these time limits starts from the later of: (i) date of communication of order or (ii) date when the President or State President enters office.
Section 112(8) of CGST Act (as amended) requires:
Pre-deposit of 20% of the disputed amount for GSTAT appeals
This is in reference to the 10% already deposited in relation to the first appeal. This indicates that if 10% is deposited for the First Appeal, then only an additional 10% needs to be submitted. If this is a direct appeal to the Tribunal or if there was no payment made prior to the First Appellate Authority, then a total of 20% must be paid.
Recent amendments to the Finance Act have revised the pre-deposit cap to ₹20 crore for both CGST and SGST, amounting to a total of ₹40 crore. Previously, this cap was set at ₹25 crore, resulting in a total of ₹50 crore.
Appeals must be accompanied by:
Certified/attested copy of the order being appealed
Copies of all relevant documents including relied-upon documents
The prescribed fee (₹1,000 per ₹1 lakh disputed, maximum ₹25,000)
As per the GSTAT (Procedure) Rules, 2025:
Appeals must be filed electronically on the GSTAT Portal in the prescribed form
Each aggrieved person must file a separate appeal (joint appeals not permitted)
If one order-in-appeal deals with multiple original orders, separate appeals are required for each original order
All documents must be clearly legible, duly paged, indexed, and firmly tagged
The GSTAT (Procedure) Rules, 2025, provide a comprehensive framework organized into fifteen chapters:
Key Procedural Aspects
Appeals must be filed online on GSTAT Portal in the prescribed form with proper cause title, paragraphing, and numbering
Scrutiny by Registrar; defective appeals may be returned for correction
Admitted appeals are numbered and registered in the appropriate register
Registrar prepares and publishes the cause list with priority order: pronouncement, clarification, admission, orders, part-heard cases, then numerical order
Ordinary sitting hours are 10:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. and 2:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m.
Proceedings are generally open to public unless ordered otherwise
Additional evidence generally not permitted unless the Tribunal deems it necessary
The Tribunal may call for documents or summon witnesses on points at issue
Production of evidence by affidavit is allowed, with cross-examination permitted if necessary
Electronic filing and processing mandated via GSTAT Portal
Hearings may be conducted in physical mode or electronically with President's permission
All proceedings recorded on the portal
Orders must be in writing, signed, and dated by bench members
Timeline: within 30 days from final hearing (excluding vacations/holidays)
Rectification of clerical mistakes allowed on application or suo motu
Appeals may be referred to a larger bench in case of difference of opinion
Detailed procedures for examination of witnesses and issue of commissions
Provisions for inspection of records by parties
Rules for handling death or insolvency of a party during proceedings
The Rules prescribe several standardized forms and registers to ensure uniformity:
GSTAT FORM-01: For interlocutory applications
GSTAT FORM-02: Order sheet format
GSTAT FORM-03: Application for inspection of records
GSTAT FORM-04: Memorandum of appearance
GSTAT FORM-05: Main appeal form
GSTAT FORM-06: Summons for production of documents
GSTAT CDR-01 to 08: Various registers for case tracking
Powers Similar to Civil Court
Under Section 111(2) of CGST Act, the GSTAT has powers similar to a civil court for:
Summoning and enforcing attendance
Requiring discovery and production of documents
Receiving evidence on affidavits
Requisitioning public records
Issuing commissions for examination of witnesses or documents
Dismissing representations for default or deciding ex parte
Setting aside dismissal orders
Rule 10 of GSTAT Procedure Rules grants the Tribunal inherent powers to make orders or give directions necessary for meeting the ends of justice or preventing abuse of the Tribunal process.
Section 111(3) provides that orders of the GSTAT may be enforced as if they were decrees made by a court in a suit, following procedures under Order 21 of the Civil Procedure Code.
The Finance Act, 2025 brought significant changes effective April 1, 2025:
Mandatory 10% pre-deposit even for cases involving only penalties or fees
Reduction in GSTAT pre-deposit from 20% to 10% of remaining disputed amount
Revised cap of ₹20 crore each for CGST and SGST (total ₹40 crore), down from ₹50 crore
To curb excessive litigation, the GST Council recommended specific thresholds:
₹20 lakh for appeals to GSTAT
₹1 crore for High Courts
₹2 crore for the Supreme Court
A significant development is the transfer of anti-profiteering cases under Section 171(2) to the Principal Bench of GSTAT, coupled with a sunset clause effective April 1, 2025, after which new anti-profiteering applications are not accepted.
While the procedures are now notified, the actual start of GSTAT functioning depends on:
Full appointment of Judicial and Technical members
Physical infrastructure readiness across 31 State Benches
Operationalization of the GSTAT Portal
Notification of the date when the President and Vice-Presidents "enter office"
Once operational, GSTAT is likely to face a significant influx of pending appeals that have accumulated due to its absence over the years. Managing this initial surge efficiently will be crucial.
Several drafting inconsistencies have been identified in the GSTAT Procedure Rules, such as:
Rule 50 on referring matters to a larger bench appears ultra vires Section 109(9), which mandates referral to another single member
Some rule references contain circular language or undefined terms
Certain provisions like Rule 80 (allowing advocates to attest affidavits) may lack statutory backing
Taxpayers should prepare advance strategies considering:
Gathering all necessary documentation for appeals
Calculating and arranging the 20% pre-deposit requirement
Ensuring grounds of appeal are properly framed
Familiarity with the electronic filing system
The GSTAT offers several advantages:
Access to a specialized forum with technical and judicial expertise
Potentially faster dispute resolution compared to High Courts
Uniformity in GST law interpretation across states
Convenience through e-filing and hybrid hearings
However, challenges remain:
20% pre-deposit creates cash flow impact
Adaptation to new procedures and electronic systems
Potential delays in full operationalization
The GSTAT creates significant opportunities for GST litigation practice, requiring:
Development of expertise in GSTAT Procedure Rules
Familiarity with the e-filing system and prescribed forms
Strategic advisory on appeal viability
The operational GSTAT should significantly reduce the burden on High Courts by:
Providing a specialized forum for GST appeals
Serving as the final fact-finding body
Allowing High Courts to focus on substantial questions of law
The GST Appellate Tribunal represents the missing link in India's GST dispute resolution mechanism. Its establishment completes the multi-tiered appeal structure envisioned under the GST framework and should bring greater consistency, specialization, and efficiency to GST litigation.
The notification of the GSTAT Procedure Rules marks a significant milestone, but practical challenges in infrastructure, appointments, and caseload management remain. The success of this institution will ultimately depend on swift operationalization across all benches, adequate staffing, and the effective implementation of the procedural framework established by the rules.
For taxpayers and tax professionals, preparation for GSTAT functioning should begin now, with particular attention to potential appeals, documentation requirements, and pre-deposit calculations. Understanding the procedural nuances of the GSTAT Rules will be essential for effective advocacy before this new forum.


A weekly newsletter delivering sharp insights, strategic analysis, and critical updates on business, finance, and compliance — designed exclusively for CFOs and Finance Leaders