Masters India
Masters India
Products
Tools
Resources
Company

Comprehensive Analysis of the GST Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT)

Abhishek Raja Ram
Abhishek Raja Ram at May 21, 2025

1. Introduction and Constitutional Framework

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) represents a critical component in India's GST dispute resolution framework. After nearly eight years since GST implementation, the GSTAT is finally becoming operational with the notification of the GST Appellate Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 2025 on April 24, 2025.

The constitutional foundation for GSTAT lies in Article 323B of the Constitution of India, inserted through the 42nd Amendment in 1976. This article empowers appropriate legislatures to establish tribunals for tax-related matters, including "levy, assessment, collection and enforcement of any tax." The article further authorizes establishment of a hierarchy of tribunals and provides for exclusion of court jurisdiction except the Supreme Court under Article 136.

The GSTAT is established under Section 109 of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act, 2017, serving as the second appellate forum in the GST dispute resolution hierarchy, after the first appellate authority (under Section 107) or revisional authority (under Section 108).

2. Structure and Composition of GSTAT

Principal and State Benches

The GSTAT consists of a Principal Bench in New Delhi and multiple State Benches across India. Currently, 31 State Benches have been designated throughout the country, strategically located to serve different states and regions.

Composition of Benches

  • Principal Bench: Consists of the President, one Judicial Member, one Technical Member (Centre), and one Technical Member (State).

  • State Benches: Each comprises two Judicial Members, one Technical Member (Centre), and one Technical Member (State).

  • Vice-President: The senior-most Judicial Member within the State Benches is designated as Vice-President for those benches, exercising specified powers of the President.

Current Leadership

Justice (Retd.) Sanjaya Kumar Mishra, former Chief Justice of the Jharkhand High Court, has been appointed as the President of GSTAT. His appointment follows selection by a Search-cum-Selection Committee headed by the Chief Justice of India.

Jurisdictional Distribution

The distribution of cases follows clear jurisdictional principles:

  1. Principal Bench Exclusive Jurisdiction:

    • Appeals involving any issue related to "place of supply"

    • Anti-profiteering matters under Section 171(2) of CGST Act

    • Any other matters specifically notified by the government on GST Council's recommendation

  2. State Benches: Handle all other appeals against orders passed by Appellate Authorities or Revisional Authorities within their territorial jurisdiction.

  3. Single Member Bench: For appeals where the disputed amount (tax, input tax credit, fine, fee, or penalty) does not exceed ₹50 lakhs and no question of law is involved, a single member may hear the case with the President's approval.

3. Appeals Process Before GSTAT

Eligibility and Grounds

  • Appeals can be filed by any person aggrieved by an order passed against them under Section 107 (appellate authority) or Section 108 (revisional authority).

  • Unlike appeals before the first appellate authority (which allows "any person aggrieved"), GSTAT appeals can only be filed by a person against whom the order was passed.

Time Limits

  • Appeals must be filed within 3 months from the date of communication of the challenged order.

  • The GSTAT can condone a delay of up to another 3 months on sufficient cause being shown.

  • For departmental appeals, the time limit is 6 months, with a similar 3-month condonation period.

  • Importantly, the clock for these time limits starts from the later of: (i) date of communication of order or (ii) date when the President or State President enters office.

Pre-deposit Requirements

Section 112(8) of CGST Act (as amended) requires:

  • Pre-deposit of 20% of the disputed amount for GSTAT appeals

  • This is in reference to the 10% already deposited in relation to the first appeal. This indicates that if 10% is deposited for the First Appeal, then only an additional 10% needs to be submitted. If this is a direct appeal to the Tribunal or if there was no payment made prior to the First Appellate Authority, then a total of 20% must be paid.

  • Recent amendments to the Finance Act have revised the pre-deposit cap to ₹20 crore for both CGST and SGST, amounting to a total of ₹40 crore. Previously, this cap was set at ₹25 crore, resulting in a total of ₹50 crore.

Documentation Requirements

Appeals must be accompanied by:

  • Certified/attested copy of the order being appealed

  • Copies of all relevant documents including relied-upon documents

  • The prescribed fee (₹1,000 per ₹1 lakh disputed, maximum ₹25,000)

Filing Procedure

As per the GSTAT (Procedure) Rules, 2025:

  • Appeals must be filed electronically on the GSTAT Portal in the prescribed form

  • Each aggrieved person must file a separate appeal (joint appeals not permitted)

  • If one order-in-appeal deals with multiple original orders, separate appeals are required for each original order

  • All documents must be clearly legible, duly paged, indexed, and firmly tagged

4. Procedural Framework under GSTAT Rules, 2025

The GSTAT (Procedure) Rules, 2025, provide a comprehensive framework organized into fifteen chapters:

Key Procedural Aspects

Filing and Registration:

  • Appeals must be filed online on GSTAT Portal in the prescribed form with proper cause title, paragraphing, and numbering

  • Scrutiny by Registrar; defective appeals may be returned for correction

  • Admitted appeals are numbered and registered in the appropriate register

Cause List and Hearing Procedure:

  • Registrar prepares and publishes the cause list with priority order: pronouncement, clarification, admission, orders, part-heard cases, then numerical order

  • Ordinary sitting hours are 10:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. and 2:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m.

  • Proceedings are generally open to public unless ordered otherwise

Evidence Rules:

  • Additional evidence generally not permitted unless the Tribunal deems it necessary

  • The Tribunal may call for documents or summon witnesses on points at issue

  • Production of evidence by affidavit is allowed, with cross-examination permitted if necessary

Digitalization and Hybrid Hearings:

  • Electronic filing and processing mandated via GSTAT Portal

  • Hearings may be conducted in physical mode or electronically with President's permission

  • All proceedings recorded on the portal

Order Pronouncement and Rectification:

  • Orders must be in writing, signed, and dated by bench members

  • Timeline: within 30 days from final hearing (excluding vacations/holidays)

  • Rectification of clerical mistakes allowed on application or suo motu

  • Appeals may be referred to a larger bench in case of difference of opinion

Special Procedures:

  • Detailed procedures for examination of witnesses and issue of commissions

  • Provisions for inspection of records by parties

  • Rules for handling death or insolvency of a party during proceedings

Forms and Registers

The Rules prescribe several standardized forms and registers to ensure uniformity:

  • GSTAT FORM-01: For interlocutory applications

  • GSTAT FORM-02: Order sheet format

  • GSTAT FORM-03: Application for inspection of records

  • GSTAT FORM-04: Memorandum of appearance

  • GSTAT FORM-05: Main appeal form

  • GSTAT FORM-06: Summons for production of documents

  • GSTAT CDR-01 to 08: Various registers for case tracking

5. Special Powers and Functions

Powers Similar to Civil Court

Under Section 111(2) of CGST Act, the GSTAT has powers similar to a civil court for:

  • Summoning and enforcing attendance

  • Requiring discovery and production of documents

  • Receiving evidence on affidavits

  • Requisitioning public records

  • Issuing commissions for examination of witnesses or documents

  • Dismissing representations for default or deciding ex parte

  • Setting aside dismissal orders

Inherent Powers

Rule 10 of GSTAT Procedure Rules grants the Tribunal inherent powers to make orders or give directions necessary for meeting the ends of justice or preventing abuse of the Tribunal process.

Execution of Orders

Section 111(3) provides that orders of the GSTAT may be enforced as if they were decrees made by a court in a suit, following procedures under Order 21 of the Civil Procedure Code.

6. Recent Changes and Contextual Developments

Pre-Deposit Rule Changes

The Finance Act, 2025 brought significant changes effective April 1, 2025:

  • Mandatory 10% pre-deposit even for cases involving only penalties or fees

  • Reduction in GSTAT pre-deposit from 20% to 10% of remaining disputed amount

  • Revised cap of ₹20 crore each for CGST and SGST (total ₹40 crore), down from ₹50 crore

Monetary Limits for Departmental Appeals

To curb excessive litigation, the GST Council recommended specific thresholds:

  • ₹20 lakh for appeals to GSTAT

  • ₹1 crore for High Courts

  • ₹2 crore for the Supreme Court

Anti-Profiteering Transition

A significant development is the transfer of anti-profiteering cases under Section 171(2) to the Principal Bench of GSTAT, coupled with a sunset clause effective April 1, 2025, after which new anti-profiteering applications are not accepted.

7. Practical Challenges and Considerations

Timeline for Operationalisation

While the procedures are now notified, the actual start of GSTAT functioning depends on:

  • Full appointment of Judicial and Technical members

  • Physical infrastructure readiness across 31 State Benches

  • Operationalization of the GSTAT Portal

  • Notification of the date when the President and Vice-Presidents "enter office"

Potential Initial Caseload

Once operational, GSTAT is likely to face a significant influx of pending appeals that have accumulated due to its absence over the years. Managing this initial surge efficiently will be crucial.

Procedural Drafting Issues

Several drafting inconsistencies have been identified in the GSTAT Procedure Rules, such as:

  • Rule 50 on referring matters to a larger bench appears ultra vires Section 109(9), which mandates referral to another single member

  • Some rule references contain circular language or undefined terms

  • Certain provisions like Rule 80 (allowing advocates to attest affidavits) may lack statutory backing

Appeal Strategy Considerations

Taxpayers should prepare advance strategies considering:

  • Gathering all necessary documentation for appeals

  • Calculating and arranging the 20% pre-deposit requirement

  • Ensuring grounds of appeal are properly framed

  • Familiarity with the electronic filing system

8. Impact on Stakeholders

For Taxpayers and Businesses

The GSTAT offers several advantages:

  • Access to a specialized forum with technical and judicial expertise

  • Potentially faster dispute resolution compared to High Courts

  • Uniformity in GST law interpretation across states

  • Convenience through e-filing and hybrid hearings

However, challenges remain:

  • 20% pre-deposit creates cash flow impact

  • Adaptation to new procedures and electronic systems

  • Potential delays in full operationalization

For Tax Professionals

The GSTAT creates significant opportunities for GST litigation practice, requiring:

  • Development of expertise in GSTAT Procedure Rules

  • Familiarity with the e-filing system and prescribed forms

  • Strategic advisory on appeal viability

For Judicial System

The operational GSTAT should significantly reduce the burden on High Courts by:

  • Providing a specialized forum for GST appeals

  • Serving as the final fact-finding body

  • Allowing High Courts to focus on substantial questions of law

9. Conclusion

The GST Appellate Tribunal represents the missing link in India's GST dispute resolution mechanism. Its establishment completes the multi-tiered appeal structure envisioned under the GST framework and should bring greater consistency, specialization, and efficiency to GST litigation.

The notification of the GSTAT Procedure Rules marks a significant milestone, but practical challenges in infrastructure, appointments, and caseload management remain. The success of this institution will ultimately depend on swift operationalization across all benches, adequate staffing, and the effective implementation of the procedural framework established by the rules.

For taxpayers and tax professionals, preparation for GSTAT functioning should begin now, with particular attention to potential appeals, documentation requirements, and pre-deposit calculations. Understanding the procedural nuances of the GSTAT Rules will be essential for effective advocacy before this new forum.

Related Articles:

About the Author

Abhishek Raja Ram

Abhishek Raja Ram

Senior Author

Abhishek Raja Ram - Popularly known as Revolutionary Raja; is FCA, DISA, Certificate Courses on – Valuation, Indirect Taxes , GST etc, M. Com (F&T) Mr. Abhishek Raja “Ram” is a Fellow member of Read more...

Rate your experience
4.70 / 5. Vote count: 2111
Ensure 100% Compliant GST Annual Return
Ensure 100% Compliant GST Annual Return
Talk to Masters India GST Experts and make your GSTR-9 & GSTR-9C filing error-free.

Check out other Similar Posts

No Data found
No Blogs to show

CFO Weekly Digest

A weekly newsletter delivering sharp insights, strategic analysis, and critical updates on business, finance, and compliance — designed exclusively for CFOs and Finance Leaders